Goat Funded Trader vs Lark Funding
Two firms, the same rows, so the numbers line up. Green marks the better figure.
Goat Funded Trader (A tier, score 47) and Lark Funding (A tier, score 47) sit level on today's FirmTiers board; the row-by-row table below is where they separate.
Data updated Tuesday, September 22 · scores re-run nightly| Goat Funded TraderTier A · CFD | Δ | Lark FundingTier A · CFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | A — Excellent | tie | A — Excellent |
| Tier score | 47 | tie | 47 |
| Board rank | #7 of 32Δ 1 places | 1 places | #8 of 32 |
| Status | 📉 Losing | · | ➡️ Stable |
| PFM rating | 4.2★ | 0.3 ★ | 4.5★Δ 0.3 ★ |
| Goat Funded TraderTier A · CFD | Δ | Lark FundingTier A · CFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 85%Δ 5% | 5% | 80% |
| Payout speed | 48h | · | 48h |
| Live code | 45% off · GFT45Δ 45% | 45% | None live |
| Cheapest / $1K | $2.51Δ $1.19 | $1.19 | $3.70 |
Matched challenge
Same type, same account size, both firms.| Goat Funded TraderTier A · CFD | Δ | Lark FundingTier A · CFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | 2-Step GOAT 100K | · | 3-Step 100K |
| Price after code | $262.90 with GFT45 · was $478Δ $107.1 | $107.1 | $370 |
| Cost per $1K | $2.63Δ $1.07 | $1.07 | $3.70 |
| Type | 2-Step eval | · | 2-Step eval |
| Account size | $100K | · | $100K |
| Profit target | 8% → 6% | 3% | 5% → 4% → 3%Δ 3% |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | · | No limit |
| Max drawdown | 10%Δ 5% | 5% | 5% |
| Min trading days | — | · | 0 |
| Profit split | up to 100% (add-on)Δ 20% | 20% | 80% |
| First payout | Bi-weekly | tie | Bi-weekly |
| Leverage / contracts | Up to 1:100 | · | 50:1 |
Want different challenges or firms? Open the interactive compare tool.
Disclosure Both buttons route through FirmTiers affiliate links: we earn a commission at no cost to you, and it has no effect on either firm's tier score. Challenge parameters are standardised across firms and re-verified against each firm's help centre.