trustpilot.com ↗ Tuesday, September 22

Atmos Funded publishes a Trustpilot reply that opens with the line Revising a review reply to sound more genuine

Atmos Funded's Trustpilot account answered a five-star review by fatme (TZ, Sep 14) on Sep 16. The published reply's first line reads "Revising a review reply to sound more genuine." and sits above the greeting. What follows thanks the reviewer and says the firm is glad the payout issue was resolved after review and that it keeps KYC straightforward. The line is still on the live reply. Atmos replied to 9 of its 12 Trustpilot reviews since Sep 5, and to 3 of the 6 one-star ones. This is the firm's own published text, not a reviewer's claim.

Atmos Funded · Tuesday, September 22 · Receipts stay linked: the claim above carries its original post.

Firm response

No reply captured

No reply captured: a gap in what we could archive, not evidence of silence.

More mess

All drama →

trustpilot.com ↗Sep 22🔇 No reply captured

Atmos Funded: 3 traders say payouts were denied on rule grounds since Sep 16, one over $9,647

Three Trustpilot reviewers since Sep 16 say Atmos Funded refused a payout and offered something smaller. A Pakistani reviewer says a $50,000 Instant account made $9,647 and the payout was rejected as one-sided trading, with 30 percent offered. Another says $800 plus was blocked over a 1 percent BTCUSD risk rule, with a $5 reset offered. A verified Australian reviewer says a fresh account was offered instead of payment. Atmos replied to 9 of the 12 in-window reviews, every positive one but only 3 of the 6 one-star. It answered 2 of these 3, saying decisions rest on "documented evidence and on the rules previously set out on our website". The $9,647 review had no reply at the Sep 22 pull.

A4 receipts

trustpilot.com ↗Sep 22🔇 No reply captured

FundingPips: 13 Trustpilot reviewers in a day say accounts were breached, blocked, closed or suspended over news; 11 say not high-impact

Thirteen distinct Trustpilot reviewers, publishing on 2026-09-21, say their accounts were breached, blocked, closed, suspended or terminated over a trade around a news event. Twelve are one-star, one is two-star. Eleven say the event was not red or high-impact; eight of them name Forex Factory. Five describe the firm's own calendar: one says it marked the same event restricted, one says the event appeared about 30 minutes later, one says medium events are treated as high-impact, one says the dashboard calendar showed no data, one says it listed only low-impact news. The firm has not replied to any of the 120 reviews pulled.

D4 receipts