trustpilot.com ↗ Tuesday, September 22

FundedNext: 3 Trustpilot reviewers in 20 hours say an account was taken or terminated, and a 4th says a passed step 1 was never funded

Four FundedNext Trustpilot reviewers (09-21 09:07Z to 09-22 01:42Z) say they lost an account or were never funded. Three say an account was taken or terminated; two say they passed a phase. Shendi Qerimi (XK) says he passed Phase 1, was rejected four or five times on suspicion someone else traded his account, offered a live video call to prove identity, and that the account was terminated and the challenge fee not refunded. A Nigeria reviewer says an account with a payout on it was taken over VPN use. A 3-star Kosovo reviewer says the account was taken with no daily losses. An India reviewer says a passed step 1 never became a funded account. The firm replied to none of 120 reviews pulled.

FundedNext · Tuesday, September 22 · Receipts stay linked: the claim above carries its original post.

Firm response

No reply captured

No reply captured: a gap in what we could archive, not evidence of silence.

More mess

All drama →

trustpilot.com ↗Aug 19🔇 No reply captured

FundedNext platform-malfunction complaints: 5 traders on Trustpilot and Reddit allege freezes, phantom losses, unanswered tickets

Three 1-star Trustpilot reviews posted 2026-08-19 allege trading-platform malfunctions at FundedNext. Reviewer Soha (Oman) writes that MT5 logs show 4 duplicated trades executed and closed at the same second, 12:59:59, cites ticket #125045398 and 4 order IDs (#260115868, #260115905, #260116449, #260116468), and says support stopped responding on email (trustpilot.com/reviews/6a86035896a668886ab91f43). Reviewer Pepa Drtik (Czechia) alleges a 1-minute platform freeze and API desync produced a "fake drawdown created by system lag", cites ticket #125853280, and says support blamed his own tech stack (trustpilot.com/reviews/6a855f84b2ad8f61cd839346). A third same-day Italian review (id 6a85de6ea4d8c5eb1bb37fd5) alleges positions opened without the trader's action and a stop-loss closed at a price the market never reached, with no support reply. Two earlier Reddit posts, both 2026-08-13, describe the same mechanism: r/propfirm user Pionex_exchange alleges a FundedNext Futures API sync error recorded a 2,803 dollar loss and a false Max Loss Breach on a day Tradovate clearing logs show a 1,631 dollar profit, cites ticket #124183199, and says the case was escalated to the Ajman Free Zone Authority; r/PropFirms user Open_Buy114 alleges repeated server disconnects during a winning NDX100 trade, with support ticket #124359127 confirming a server issue in writing and escalation ticket #124420451 then denying any issue. All 5 reports come from unverified single-report accounts, engagement is minimal (Reddit scores of 1, 0 to 1 comments), and FundedNext has not replied to any of the 5 in the scraped data. Every claim above is the complainant's allegation, not a confirmed finding.

A1 receipt

trustpilot.com ↗Sep 22🔇 No reply captured

FundedNext: 2 Trustpilot reviewers say accounts stayed inactive after crypto payments, one citing a $50 USDT Binance case

Two reviewers say they paid in crypto and their accounts were not activated. DMC BACK (IQ, 09-21) says four transfers totalling $50 USDT went to two official deposit addresses for account 134019022, that Binance investigated under case 16997999 and confirmed delivery on chain, that payment gateway Coinsbuy told him the firm must contact it directly, and that support has not credited or refunded the $50. raja waleed (PK, 09-21) says his account is still inactive five days after his crypto payment, and that he logged a ticket and sent proof but is told each time it will be resolved in 24 to 48 hours. In the same slice a five star reviewer says a USDT purchase went through without issues.

A3 receipts