Hantec Trader reviewer reports $3,006 Instant24 payout denial under T&C clause 7.2.C.xv overleveraging rule
Aug 19 PropFirmMatch review (Husain, LB, $100K Instant24, reached payout: No, satisfaction 1.0): reviewer reports 36 trades, 86.1% win rate, 6.93 profit factor, and says Hantec rejected a $3,006 payout citing "overleveraging" under T&C clause 7.2.C.xv on 2 of the 36 trades, both ETHUSD opened on a Sunday at roughly 96% margin usage per the reviewer's PFM denial report, refunded only the entry fee and withheld the profit. Reviewer states a formal settlement request and a complaint to regulatory bodies are filed; the PFM report attaches 3 supporting documents. Theme corroboration is prior-window only: TheTrustedProp's evergreen Hantec review reports multiple Trustpilot accounts of Instant24 payout denials tied to scalping or slippage rules and an 85% margin-usage rule, PFM's 50-review summary says some traders report the leverage rule applied retroactively, and the June 30 Reddit denial thread was priced into the red flag on 08-10. The only other in-window PFM review (Aug 18, 4.0 stars) says the margin/leverage rule was recently lifted, so this is 1 in-window complaint, not a cluster: heat 1. Drama platform enum lacks PropFirmMatch (08-10 and 08-15 Equity Edge precedent); route as news_event type warning, not drama_story, and capture the review as a receipt screenshot before publishing.
Check the source Firm response
No reply captured
No reply captured: a gap in what we could archive, not evidence of silence.













































