In this article
- What is new in the FundedElite IP-rule story?
- What happened to the largest disputed payout?
- What is the FundedElite Live Account transition?
- Does a dedicated IP protect you from the rule?
- Has FundedElite responded?
- Is FundedElite a scam?
- Where does FundedElite sit on the board?
FundedElite's IP rule is back on Trustpilot, and the numbers got bigger. Between August 28 and September 5, seven one-star reviews landed on the firm's profile, and five of them describe an IP-sharing or IP-switching finding at payout time. Four are new reviewers since our August 26 story. One of them says a $16,310 payout was blocked under an "IP sharing violation" that grew two more reasons as the conversation went on. Two describe something we had not seen before: an offer to move to a "Live Account" with a drawdown buffer equal to the payout that was owed.
The firm replied to none of the seven.
What is new in the FundedElite IP-rule story?
Our August 26 story recorded a trader who said FundedElite closed two accounts after a $125 payout request. Today's escalation adds:
- Four more reviewers citing the IP rule at payout, across the UK, India and Turkey.
- A $16,310 disputed payout, the largest figure in the cluster.
- A "Live Account" transition mechanism, described independently by two reviewers, in which the trader's remaining drawdown becomes a buffer the size of the payout they were about to take.
- A $150 dedicated IP that, per one reviewer, did not prevent the outcome.
A fifth IP-rule review, posted September 5 about an August 24 experience, plausibly describes the same account as our August 26 story ($125 payout, second account closed). We have quoted it for the mechanism below but not counted it as a new reviewer. The headline says four for that reason.
What happened to the largest disputed payout?
Per the reviewer (Turkey, September 3), who describes themselves as a repeat customer who referred traders and promoted the firm:
- They earned $16,310 and found the withdrawal option missing from the dashboard.
- Support told them the account had an "IP sharing violation," with no IP details, dates or evidence offered.
- Then a "multiple country violation" was added, for activity from Turkey and Greece, travel the reviewer says they had cleared with staff in advance.
- Then Turkey was named as a restricted country.
- The resolution offered was a "free reset," which the reviewer read as losing the payout and starting over.

The reviewer's own framing is worth keeping: "I am not claiming that prop firms cannot enforce rules." The complaint is that the reasons kept expanding. That is the reviewer's account; the firm has not given its version.
What is the FundedElite Live Account transition?
Two reviewers describe it the same way. A trader with a funded account requests a payout and is instead offered a move to a "Live Account," where the available drawdown buffer is set to roughly the payout amount.
- The 18-month customer (UK, August 28) says that after a $4,000 first payout arrived in its second week, a second request of about $5,000 on a $200K account produced an offer: continue on a $200K Live Account with a buffer of only $4,494, or take the payout and be barred from buying further challenges. They took the payout and left. They also say an earlier account had been reset over an IP flag at an $8,000 payout.

- The dedicated-IP reviewer (India, September 5) says a $125 profit produced a Live Account offer with a $125 buffer, against a $700 drawdown on the funded account. When they refused, they say, the $125 was declared their "final payout," a second evaluation account was closed, and they were told they could not buy future challenges.

We have not seen FundedElite's own terms for a Live Account transition. If the mechanism is in the firm's rules, it is a payout-time conversion of a sim account into something with a much thinner cushion; if it is not, it is an ad hoc offer. Either way it is the detail traders should ask about before buying. That read is ours.
Does a dedicated IP protect you from the rule?
Not according to the one reviewer who tried. They say they spent $150 on a dedicated IP through a VPN service specifically to stay inside FundedElite's IP rules, passed, took a first payout, and still ended up with a Live Account offer and a closed second account. Whether the firm's decision in that case rested on the IP at all is not stated in the review, and the firm has not said. What the review documents is that a trader who paid to comply did not avoid the dispute.
Has FundedElite responded?
No. Zero of the seven one-star reviews in the window carry a firm reply, and our August 26 story recorded no reply either. Two further one-stars in the window are about customer service rather than the rule and are not counted above.
Is FundedElite a scam?
The reviews do not establish that, and we are not using the word.
What they establish: five reviewers in nine days say the IP rule was invoked when they asked for money, that the explanations were thin or shifting, and that the alternative offered was a reset, a barred account or a Live Account with a small buffer. What they do not establish: that any of the IP findings was false. Shared or switching IPs are a real integrity problem for prop firms, the rule exists at most of them, and a reviewer who says "no evidence was given" is describing what they were shown, not what the firm holds.
The pattern that should concern a buyer is the timing. Every case in this cluster surfaced at payout. That is also the moment a firm checks hardest, so timing alone proves nothing. It is the firm's silence, across two stories and eleven days, that leaves the question open.
Where does FundedElite sit on the board?
FundedElite's tier position is re-scored nightly from the full sentiment and tracker picture. The firm's August 26 story is live at heat 2, and today's escalation is filed at heat 2 as well. Check the firm's page for its current standing.
See where every firm sits today
The full S–D board, re-scored nightly at 03:00 UTC.
Links to firms in this article are affiliate links: FirmTiers earns a commission at no cost to you. Affiliate relationships never affect Drama or Pulse coverage, and a boost can't move a firm more than one tier.













































