Lark Funding vs Moneta Funded
Two firms, the same rows, so the numbers line up. Green marks the better figure.
Lark Funding (A tier, score 47) and Moneta Funded (S tier, score 52). Moneta Funded ranks higher on today's FirmTiers board. Best value per row is marked below.
Data updated Tuesday, September 22 · scores re-run nightly| Lark FundingTier A · CFD | Δ | Moneta FundedTier S · CFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier | A — Excellent | 1 tier | S — SuperbΔ 1 tier |
| Tier score | 47 | 5 pts | 52Δ 5 pts |
| Board rank | #8 of 32 | 4 places | #4 of 32Δ 4 places |
| Status | ➡️ Stable | · | ➡️ Stable |
| PFM rating | 4.5★ | 0.4 ★ | 4.9★Δ 0.4 ★ |
| Lark FundingTier A · CFD | Δ | Moneta FundedTier S · CFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 80% | tie | 80% |
| Payout speed | 48h | · | 48h |
| Live code | None live | 40% | 40% off · FLASH40Δ 40% |
| Cheapest / $1K | $3.70 | $0.1 | $3.60Δ $0.1 |
Matched challenge
Same type, same account size, both firms.| Lark FundingTier A · CFD | Δ | Moneta FundedTier S · CFD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | 3-Step 100K | · | 2-Step (4%/8%) 100K |
| Price after code | $370Δ $26 | $26 | $396 with FLASH40 · was $660 |
| Cost per $1K | $3.70Δ $0.26 | $0.26 | $3.96 |
| Type | 2-Step eval | · | 2-Step eval |
| Account size | $100K | · | $100K |
| Profit target | 5% → 4% → 3% | tie | 5% → 10% |
| Daily loss limit | No limit | · | 4% |
| Max drawdown | 5% | 3% | 8% staticΔ 3% |
| Min trading days | 0Δ 3d | 3d | 3 profitable days (≥0.5%) |
| Profit split | 80% | 8% | 88%Δ 8% |
| First payout | Bi-weekly | tie | 14 days |
| Leverage / contracts | 50:1 | · | Up to 1:100 |
Want different challenges or firms? Open the interactive compare tool.
Disclosure Both buttons route through FirmTiers affiliate links: we earn a commission at no cost to you, and it has no effect on either firm's tier score. Challenge parameters are standardised across firms and re-verified against each firm's help centre.