Goat Funded Trader answered 90 of 103 Trustpilot reviews since Sept 5, yet 22 reviewers in that window say payouts were refused or held over alleged coordinated or copy trading, and none of its replies to them offers a payout.
- Goat Funded Trader answered 90 of 103 reviews since Sept 5; 22 say payouts were refused or held over alleged copy or coordinated trading
- At least 13 FundingPips reviewers on Sept 21 link a breached, blocked, closed or suspended account to news; at least 11 say not high-impact
- At least 9 reviewers say Lucid Trading banned them or closed accounts over a chargeback they dispute; none of their reviews has a reply
- Atmos Funded published a Trustpilot reply that opens with the line Revising a review reply to sound more genuine
- Hola Prime says it removed its 60% per-trade profit concentration rule, 70% per-trade margin cap and 3-minute stop-loss deadline
The Pulse
Direction of travel, not a verdict.Traders keep reporting payouts refused or held over a coordinated or copy trading finding, and the firm answers most of them on the record without offering a payout.
Reviews posted on a single day report accounts breached, blocked, closed or suspended over news most of them say was not rated red or top impact, alongside more reports of accounts terminated or blocked over device matches.
Traders describe bans or closures over a chargeback they dispute, most saying they never filed one, alongside separate bans or closures citing cross-user activity, some as a payout was due.
The firm says it removed three rules from every active challenge and funded account automatically, with nothing to buy or reset.
The firm answers nearly every five star review, many with the same stock lines, and almost none of its one star ones, and it answered none of the account closure or ban reports.
Among the reviews pulled, every reply went to a four or five star review and none to a critical one, with all but one of the skipped complaints landing before its last logged reply.
Among the reviews pulled, its only replies were one template posted to eight positive reviews inside three minutes, with nothing to the purchase block reports.
Verified on-chain payouts rose more in dollars than at any other board firm with a PayoutJunction reading, and it opened a free to enter league with a seven figure pool.
A trader puts a payout refused as a terms breach at five figures, and a review reporting a frozen account went unanswered for days while positive reviews got replies.
A published reply opens with a line about revising it to sound more genuine.
Every review in the window drew a reply, and some name the account and the exact breach margin.
Reviewers report payouts rejected or withheld, at least two of them citing an impulsive trading reason.
The firm answers most of its reviews individually rather than by template, including critical ones.
A one phase plan with payouts every day and no consistency rule on the funded account went live on the firm's own page.
A pay on pass account puts the entry cost at a few dollars, with the balance due only when the trader passes.
In the reviews pulled, the firm answers only its critical ones, reinstated one account and corrected a figure its support team had quoted.
Drama 🍿
Every claim ships with receipts. Heat = how loud, not how proven.Affiliate accuses peers of reselling prop-firm giveaway accounts instead of distributing them
Goat Funded Trader: 22 traders since Sept 5 say payouts were refused or held over alleged coordinated or copy trading, one over $9,000
Lucid Trading: 10 Trustpilot reviewers say they were accused of a chargeback they dispute, and 9 say they were banned
Codes live that day
Tap a code to copy it. Expiries are what the firm published.🎁 Affiliate giveaways
Free accounts, running now.Also today
A firm in today's Drama can't appear here.👀 Watch
Tick one to clear it.That's the whole brief.
This issue is archived. The board has re-scored since, and today's brief is at the top of the site.



















































